The Dorean Principle (book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| topics = Christian ministry fundraising and [[wikipedia:Intellectual_property|intellectual property]] issues | | topics = Christian ministry fundraising and [[wikipedia:Intellectual_property|intellectual property]] issues | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''The Dorean Principle: ''A Biblical Response to the Commercialization of Christianity''''' is a book authored by [[Conley Owens]], pastor of [[Silicon Valley Reformed Baptist Church]] (California, United States of America), that defines the [[Dorean principle]] and makes the arguments for why the Scriptures teach that Christian ministry should be voluntarily supported (co-laboring) and not commercialized/sold (reciprocity). It also deals with the concepts of [[wikipedia:Intellectual_property|intellectual property]], concluding that in legal systems where creators are entitled to copyrights by default (and in a culture where this is the common practice for publishing models, which incentivize copyrighting), that the biblical ethic is for Christians to be putting Christian ministry resources in the [[wikipedia:Public_domain|public domain]]. | '''The Dorean Principle: ''A Biblical Response to the Commercialization of Christianity''''' is a book authored by [[Conley Owens]], pastor of [[Silicon Valley Reformed Baptist Church]] (California, United States of America), that defines the [[Dorean principle]] and makes the arguments for why the Scriptures teach that Christian ministry should be voluntarily supported (co-laboring) and not commercialized/sold (reciprocity). It also deals with the concepts of [[wikipedia:Intellectual_property|intellectual property]], concluding that in legal systems where creators are entitled to copyrights by default (and in a culture where this is the common practice for publishing models, which incentivize copyrighting), that the biblical ethic is for Christians to be putting Christian ministry resources in the [[wikipedia:Public_domain|public domain]]. | ||
Line 1,387: | Line 1,385: | ||
If copyright is not a natural right, then its protection is not a legitimate function of government. If copyright is not a natural right, then it is unethical for any man or ministry to use the power of the government in a court of law to enforce copyright. In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders’ rights, such an action would be a violation of the consumers’ rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information in their possession.<sup>[5]</sup> | If copyright is not a natural right, then its protection is not a legitimate function of government. If copyright is not a natural right, then it is unethical for any man or ministry to use the power of the government in a court of law to enforce copyright. In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders’ rights, such an action would be a violation of the consumers’ rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information in their possession.<sup>[5]</sup> | ||
# | # May, C., & Sell, S. K. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Lynne Rienner Publishers p. 5. | ||
# | # The Statute of Anne (1710) was the first legislated copyright protection to be enforced by public courts. | ||
# | # See May, R. J., & Cooper, S. L. (2015). The Constitutional Foundations of Intellectual Property: A Natural Rights Perspective. Carolina Academic Press. | ||
# | # Jefferson, T. Letter to Isaac McPherson (1813). | ||
# | # For fuller arguments from similar perspectives, see Kinsella, N. S. (2008). Against Intellectual Property. Ludwig von Mises Institute; Poythress, V. Copyright and Copying: Why The Laws Should Be Changed. Retrieved May 23, 2020, from [https://frame-poythress.org/copyrights-and-copying-why-the-laws-should-be-changed https://frame-poythress.org/copyrights-and-copying-why-the-laws-should-be-changed] | ||
== Bibliography == | == Bibliography == |