The Dorean Principle (book): Difference between revisions

ReformedMandalorian (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1,385: Line 1,385:
If copyright is not a natural right, then its protection is not a legitimate function of government. If copyright is not a natural right, then it is unethical for any man or ministry to use the power of the government in a court of law to enforce copyright. In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders’ rights, such an action would be a violation of the consumers’ rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information in their possession.⁠<sup>[5]</sup>
If copyright is not a natural right, then its protection is not a legitimate function of government. If copyright is not a natural right, then it is unethical for any man or ministry to use the power of the government in a court of law to enforce copyright. In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders’ rights, such an action would be a violation of the consumers’ rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information in their possession.⁠<sup>[5]</sup>


# X
# May, C., & Sell, S. K. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Lynne Rienner Publishers p. 5.
# X
# The Statute of Anne (1710) was the first legislated copyright protection to be enforced by public courts.
# X
# See May, R. J., & Cooper, S. L. (2015). The Constitutional Foundations of Intellectual Property: A Natural Rights Perspective. Carolina Academic Press.
# X
# Jefferson, T. Letter to Isaac McPherson (1813).
# X
# For fuller arguments from similar perspectives, see Kinsella, N. S. (2008). Against Intellectual Property. Ludwig von Mises Institute; Poythress, V. Copyright and Copying: Why The Laws Should Be Changed. Retrieved May 23, 2020, from [https://frame-poythress.org/copyrights-and-copying-why-the-laws-should-be-changed https://frame-poythress.org/copyrights-and-copying-why-the-laws-should-be-changed]


== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==