The Dorean Principle (book): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 1,385: | Line 1,385: | ||
If copyright is not a natural right, then its protection is not a legitimate function of government. If copyright is not a natural right, then it is unethical for any man or ministry to use the power of the government in a court of law to enforce copyright. In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders’ rights, such an action would be a violation of the consumers’ rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information in their possession.<sup>[5]</sup> | If copyright is not a natural right, then its protection is not a legitimate function of government. If copyright is not a natural right, then it is unethical for any man or ministry to use the power of the government in a court of law to enforce copyright. In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders’ rights, such an action would be a violation of the consumers’ rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information in their possession.<sup>[5]</sup> | ||
# | # May, C., & Sell, S. K. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Lynne Rienner Publishers p. 5. | ||
# | # The Statute of Anne (1710) was the first legislated copyright protection to be enforced by public courts. | ||
# | # See May, R. J., & Cooper, S. L. (2015). The Constitutional Foundations of Intellectual Property: A Natural Rights Perspective. Carolina Academic Press. | ||
# | # Jefferson, T. Letter to Isaac McPherson (1813). | ||
# | # For fuller arguments from similar perspectives, see Kinsella, N. S. (2008). Against Intellectual Property. Ludwig von Mises Institute; Poythress, V. Copyright and Copying: Why The Laws Should Be Changed. Retrieved May 23, 2020, from [https://frame-poythress.org/copyrights-and-copying-why-the-laws-should-be-changed https://frame-poythress.org/copyrights-and-copying-why-the-laws-should-be-changed] | ||
== Bibliography == | == Bibliography == |